A Real Woman Who Puts Liberal, Cum Belching, Whores To Shame

Why I’m still a virgin at age 26
Arleen SpenceleyArleen Spenceley, Times Staff Writer
Thursday, June 21, 2012 9:23pm

I like to talk about sex.

This is natural for a woman who grew up in a culture that surrounds us with it, who is the product of parents who taught me no topic is taboo.

But few who discuss sex with me are prepared for what I divulge: I’m a virgin.

Responses to my decision to save sex for marriage range from awkward silence to sympathy and have included the following question: “Do you really want to ruin your wedding night that way?”

I appreciate the concern. The shock that underlies it doesn’t surprise me. In our culture, the norm is for adults — married or not — to have sex. According to a 2011 study published by the National Center for Health Statistics, about 97 percent of men and 98 percent of women ages 25 to 44 aren’t virgins. So I — a 26-year-old virgin by choice — am one of the 2-percenters. Nowhere near the mainstream. Part of an insurrection (albeit a small one).

People who aren’t proponents of saving sex for marriage have warned me it’s imperative to learn what you like in sex and to confirm that what you like is what you’ll get before you vow to spend the rest of your life with someone. This, they say, is because how good sex is ultimately depends on how consistently it satisfies you. Which implies that of sex’s multiple purposes, pleasure is primary.

If it is, it is incomprehensible — even in my opinion — to marry someone with whom you haven’t had sex. That kind of sex depends on experience. But the sex I am saving isn’t that kind of sex.

The sex I save is rooted in chastity, which isn’t the same as abstinence, but requires it until marriage. For some who save sex, the decision is underpinned by a moral code uninfluenced by faith and for others, by various religious affiliations.

My decision is underlain by my beliefs that temperance is a virtue, Jesus is God and it’s important to love as he does. In Roman Catholic Christianity, chastity is a decision to die to self and to selflessly love (or to die trying). People who practice it regard all people as intrinsically valuable, reject their objectification and uphold love as a choice in a culture that calls it a feeling.

Chastity shifts a person’s focus from self to others, from what a potential husband could do for me to what he and I could do together — what we, as a unit, could contribute to the world. It is less about whether sex with him will be awkward at first and more about whether it would be a good thing for our future kids to grow up and turn into one of us.

For us, sex serves two purposes: procreation and unity. We don’t believe we’re supposed to decide to unite because sex is pleasurable, but to create a pleasurable sexual relationship with the person to whom we are permanently united.

So for us, sexual experience before marriage isn’t necessary.

But according to many, it should be.

“A comfortable sexual routine should be established before you promise to spend the rest of your life with someone,” wrote a young adult who responded to one of two informal sex surveys I recently conducted.

I sent the surveys to friends and strangers for feedback from people who are sexually experienced.

One said sex with some people is neither initially nor easily gratifying and “I don’t want to be married to someone like that.”

Another said “I want to know the sex I’m going to get is good enough to keep me loyal.”

In the search for significant others, sexual satisfaction is so chiefly sought — at least for my generation — that the thought of waiting disturbs most of the people who don’t.

“How do you know your marriage will work?” wrote one of my surveys’ respondents. “What if you find out the sex isn’t gratifying, that (your husband) has no idea what he’s doing?”

The fear is of inadvertently committing to a life of unsatisfying sex. But that fear implies sex is static, that partners who aren’t initially compatible are permanently incompatible. (And, incidentally, that “how to have better sex” advice is moot.)

According to my surveys’ participants, it can take as “long” as a month for some couples to discover they are sexually incompatible; other couples, one person wrote, can tell after having sex once.

The quest, then, isn’t really for sexual compatibility. It’s for compatibility that’s quick to cultivate, if not intuitive. But is that kind of compatibility desired because a relationship without it won’t work, or because a relationship without it takes work?

Quick compatibility is important because sex should be “comfortable and have a flow to it,” wrote one survey participant. “It’s like dancing.”

Which few are immediately good at and anyone can learn? Precisely. To achieve sexual compatibility — so I’ve heard — requires practice, communication, discomfort and vulnerability, none of which American culture encourages (unless it results in cash or glory). But what if the pursuit of that kind of sexual compatibility is at the expense of something more valuable?

Maybe it’s to a relationship’s disadvantage to pick a partner with whom you’re effortlessly sexually compatible over a partner who is willing to work through conflict. Maybe we do each other a disservice when we search for consistently gratifying sex but avoid opportunities to become people who can communicate when it isn’t. Maybe how willing we are to practice and communicate, and to be uncomfortable and vulnerable in sex predicts how willing we’ll be to do those things in other parts of a relationship.

This sort of stuff hadn’t dawned on me a few years ago, the first time I put my virginity in the paper. I was 23. I don’t disagree with what I wrote then for Perspective — that I won’t make a guy prove he can satisfy me sexually before we’re married, that marriage is a permanent merger, that I’d rather not have the option to compare sex with my husband to sex with someone else. But in the three years since I wrote it, I’ve come to some deeper conclusions.

Like how the self-denial of waiting is good practice for some of the difficult but necessary parts of marriage: not always getting what you want, making unanticipated sacrifices, eradicating self-absorption.

How people who save sex for marriage have apprenticeships in patience, definitive love and fidelity.

How we are opposed to reducing a person to a means to an end, and to giving only so long as we get something out of it.

How starting a marriage without an established sexual routine will require patience and courage, compassion and creativity. And probably a sense of humor.

I am more concerned with preparedness for marriage than with preparedness for a wedding night. Which makes it no less true that a person who is a virgin until after the wedding mostly won’t know what to do or expect. But do we really need to know?

In not knowing what I’m doing, I can express confidence in my spouse’s commitment to me. In not knowing what to expect, I can infuse my vows with authenticity.

Whatever the guy I marry and I do, it will represent our commitment to each other. It will renew it.

And I have a hunch that won’t ruin our wedding night.

Arleen Spenceley can be reached at aspenceley@tampabay.com or (727) 869-6235.

Why I’m still a virgin at age 26 06/21/12 [Last modified: Friday, June 29, 2012 9:37am]

© 2014 Tampa Bay Times


11 thoughts on “A Real Woman Who Puts Liberal, Cum Belching, Whores To Shame

  1. Because if you wait until your wedding night, not knowing what kind of sex you’re going to get- it subordinates the sex to the rest of your relationship, not the other way around. And that is as it should be. Look at the World War II generation- they waited til marriage, and their relationships lasted 60 years.

  2. in Roman Catholic Christianity, you have sex to procreate and for no other reason. I hope you can find a man who is in your age bracket and a virgin too. That will really be very high odds. The CC is totally in the dark ages where sex is concerned. They think people should have all the children they can, not practice birth control, and increase their flock in ever expanding proportions. This worked many centuries for them until people became educated. Now people are educated and aware that they do not have to follow some arbitrary set of rules designed by men to control their sexual lives. I would submit that staying a virgin will no more guarantee you success in a marriage (no divorce) than not eating meat on Friday during lent. Not having sex does not make you a ‘real woman’ or a lady. Use of phrases like “Cum Belching, Whores” does not make you sound like you’re anything even close to a ‘lady’ raised in the CC. Still it got my attention, and I’m sure that’s the reason you use such unnecessary language. You have a lot to learn about sex and life. What you don’t realize is that you are a victim of false programming, untruths, and brain washing by the CC. Good luck with your quest and remember the longer you wait – the more of your young life you are wasting and that’s something you’ll never get back… IMO

    • Thank your for the reply and for reading my blog. For the record I am a man. I mostly post articles off of news sites about topics relating to the demise of our current culture. I have complete contempt for most of the women of this generation. True purity has been almost completely wiped out. Most women today are more than happy to give their body’s over to a guy for the price of 3 dinners at an average restaurant some for less than that. I would say that makes them a common whore. A whore at least acknowledges she is exchanging money for sex. The poor women of this generation bend their brains into pretzels to think they are in love or at least in a “committed” relationship so they can perform the most vile of sexual acts on men. Men who for the most part don’t give a dam about them or their feelings as long as they can get what they want. Sorry to be so honest. I just call it like I see it. Hope you are not offended. Cheers,
      Cpt. Nemo

      • well you fool many people who read things like this and think it was written by a 26 YO female. In fact I’ll bet a man wrote this. Enough said. The picture is much clearer now just what is going on here.Like so many things on the Net, slight of hand being used to push an agenda. I never heard a Catholic woman talk like this but men – absolutely yes. Which is to say – I don’t believe you.

      • my remark that a man wrote this applies to “Cum Belching, Whores To Shame” and so I see that is correct. I’ve checked the sight/URL – oh another author pushing their book. i guess the thing that perplexes me is this – why does a guy who is so vocal about CC issues hang out and ‘like’ posts by someone who practices witchcraft and posts spells? Now that is a real mystery… to someone like me.

  3. hmmm fair enough. Well since you are using the same avatar (what a coincidence) – I’ll go back to my original as I would NOT want the witches to be confused as to who they are dealing. Funny how i got 4 likes by them right after my last comment to you. Perhaps they read all your blogs too. Well at least we know you’re not a Luciferian posing as the Light. Good luck with that conversation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s